Putting Sofia Vergara on a revolving pedestal was gut-wrenchingly insulting, but it wasn’t sexist

img, .hide-comment-buttons #singleCommentHeader .formContainer >.title, .hide-comment-buttons #loginButtonContainer display: none; /* Expandable MPU fix */ #side .x300 overflow: visible!important; /* Collapsing Skyscraper fix */ .ad div.skyscraper height:auto!important;padding:0px!important; .ad div#mpu.skyscraper height:600px!important; Emmys 2014: Putting Sofia Vergara on a revolving pedestal was gut-wrenchingly insulting, but it wasn’t sexist – Comment – Voices – The Independent Friday 10 April 2015

Apps

eBooks

i Jobs

Dating

Shop
News
Video
People
Voices Find by writer Yasmin Alibhai-Brown
Rebecca Armstrong
Memphis Barker
Max Benwell
Chris Blackhurst
Ian Burrell
Andrew Buncombe
Ben Chu
Patrick Cockburn
Mary Dejevsky
Grace Dent
Robert Fisk
Andrew Grice
Stefano Hatfield
Lucy Hunter Johnston
Howard Jacobson
Alice Jones
Ellen E Jones
Simon Kelner
Lisa Markwell
Michael McCarthy
Hamish McRae
Jane Merrick
James Moore
Matthew Norman
Dom Joly
Amol Rajan
John Rentoul
Steve Richards
Deborah Ross
Kim Sengupta
Joan Smith
Mark Steel
Janet Street-Porter
John Walsh
Andreas Whittam Smith

Comment
Editorials
Letters
IV Drip
Campaigns Homeless Veterans
Save the tiger
Elephant Campaign
Equal Partners
Delayed Diagnosis
We are Malala
Child Soldiers
Voices in Danger
The New Suffragettes
Rory Peck Awards
British Citizen Awards

Archive
Our Voices Rentoul
The Editors
The Foreign Desk
Battle of Ideas

Commentators Yasmin Alibhai-Brown
Terence Blacker
Simon Carr
Rupert Cornwell
Sloane Crosley
Mary Dejevsky
Robert Fisk
Andrew Grice
Adrian Hamilton
Philip Hensher
Howard Jacobson
Dominic Lawson
John Lichfield
Campaigns
Hamish McRae
Matthew Norman
Christina Patterson
John Rentoul
Steve Richards
Sarah Sands
Mary Ann Sieghart
Joan Smith
Mark Steel
Campaigns
Janet Street-Porter
Andreas Whittam Smith
Voices

Columnists Dom Joly
David Lister
Thomas Sutcliffe
John Walsh
Janet Street-Porter
Chris Bryant

Democracy 2015
IV Drip Archive
Blogs
Scottish independence
Save the tiger
The state of the NHS

Sport
Tech
Life
Property
Arts + Ents
Travel
Money
IndyBest
Student
Offers
Hot Topics Nom-doms Transgender Children Nicola Sturgeon Natasha Devon Follow Tuesday 26 August 2014
Putting Sofia Vergara on a revolving pedestal was gut-wrenchingly insulting, but it wasn’t sexist The incident wasnt about sex as much as it was about race
Share I look at Sofia Vergara, star of Modern Family, and I am reminded of the classic screen sirens of the 1950s. She is Marylin Monroe repackaged. If anything, she is evidence of how little progress has been made in broadening our definitions of feminine allure. And therein lies my objection to what happened at Sunday nights Emmys. As part of a segment on diversity in television, Bruce Rosenbloom – the CEO of the academy behind the television awards – invited her to stand on a revolving platform, while we applauded him and his ilk for finally allowing the non-white community on their screens.
It was as gut-wrenchingly insulting as the day Mattel dipped Barbie in brown paint and presented her as a mascot for black women.
Our success is based on always giving viewers something compelling to look at, Bruce chortled as onlookers were treated to a 360 degree view of Ms Vergara and her how are you actually breathing in that? white gown as she was turned, kebab-style, on a pedestal.
Seconds later, Twitter predictably lost it, the usual social media activists furiously typing their indignation at such a blatant display of misogyny. Ms Vergara later accused critics of the display of having an epic sense of humour failure, imploring them to see the incident in context and lighten up a bit.
Im with Sofia, in that the backlash missed the point. While its understandable that some might find the spectacle of a woman standing on a rotating pedestal whilst the host encourages us all to have a little perv objectionable, it was a poignant metaphor for any television awards show. If you dont enjoy seeing celebrities dressed in their finery braying look at me, LOOK AT ME! whilst flicking their hair and sycophant-ing all melasma treatment over the counter each other ad nauseum, then the Emmys, Oscars, Grammys etc are not the shows for you. I suggest perhaps instead flicking over to EastEnders, or a soothing nature documentary.
More important, however, is what preceded the compelling to look at quip. For Bruce Rosenbloom seemed to suggest that Ms Vergaras acceptance how to get rid of melasma into the echelons of the Hollywood A-list represents a gigantic leap forward in ethnic diversity. Our Academy is more diverse than ever before, both in front of and behind the camera, he self-congratulated.
In pictures: Hit or miss fashion roundup from the 2014 Emmy awards
This comment was largely overlooked, so I can only assume that viewers found the notion of the second ever Latina actress to win an Emmy being presented as a token of successful ethnic diversity policy in television acceptable. This is despite the fact that Ms Vergara has long, blonde, straightened hair, pale skin and the sort of paradoxically slim-but-curvy figure which some women can only achieve through the judicious use of a surgeons knife.
At a glance she shares the same physical attributes as Barbie, yet she apparently represents the best treatment for melasma hope ethnic minority women have for being included in social notions of what constitutes compelling to look at.
Fashion, beauty and media companies do this all the time and it drives me to distraction. The plus size models who are in reality a size 10 or the real women in adverts who just happen to look like models can have just as much of a negative impact on womens self-esteem as their size 6, professional counterparts. Of course, history tells us that progress tends to happen at a snails pace. Yet I cant help but feel that holding up an ethnic minority woman who has been forced to squish herself into a Caucasian approximation of what it means to be beautiful as evidence of diversity, then demanding that the public clap like seals being thrown tuna, is as daft as it is damaging.
Kneejerk sexist! reactions to pop culture are inextricably embedded in Twitters universal timeline. Not only are they part of the reason feminism has a marketing problem (#WomenAgainstFeminism anyone?) but occasionally they prevent us from seeing the bigger picture. Yes, the film and television industry is still woefully inadequate in being capable of representing everything a woman can be. Yes, this must be changed. But this incident wasnt about sex as much as it was about race and the prevailing fact that, in order to succeed, non-white people of all genders are still consistently being told they must shape themselves into a more acceptable (read: more Caucasian) form.
When a Colombian performer can accept an award without the Hollywood powers-that-be feeling the need to condescendingly draw attention to how MARVELLOUS it is that our society now graciously allows those people onto stages and screens, that will represent real progress in ethnic diversity.